| dc.contributor.author |
Ndao, Anna-Lisa |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Spalek, Katharina |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2019-07-31T13:45:18Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2019-07-31T13:45:18Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2019-07-31 |
|
| dc.identifier.other |
1672099978 |
de_DE |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/91251 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-912516 |
de_DE |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-32632 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
According to alternative semantics (Rooth, 1985, 1992), the main function of focus is to evoke contextually relevant alternatives for a focused element. The present study uses a cross-modal priming experiment to investigate the extent of these focus alternative sets that are being activated in the listeners' minds when processing a focused element. |
en |
| dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
| dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
| dc.rights |
ubt-podok |
de_DE |
| dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=de |
de_DE |
| dc.rights.uri |
http://tobias-lib.uni-tuebingen.de/doku/lic_mit_pod.php?la=en |
en |
| dc.subject.classification |
Thema-Rhema-Gliederung , Intonation <Linguistik> |
de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc |
400 |
de_DE |
| dc.subject.ddc |
430 |
de_DE |
| dc.subject.other |
focus semantics |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
alternative sets |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
intonation |
en |
| dc.subject.other |
contextual restriction |
en |
| dc.title |
What’s the Alternative? Experimental Research on the Extent of Focus Alternative Sets |
en |
| dc.type |
ConferenceObject |
de_DE |
| utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Allgemeine u. vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft |
de_DE |
| utue.publikation.fakultaet |
5 Philosophische Fakultät |
de_DE |
| utue.opus.portal |
ProcLingEvi2018 |
de_DE |
