Comparison of Errors of 35 Weight Estimation Formulae in a Standard Collective

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record Sauter, Annegret Hoopmann, Markus Kagan, Karl Oliver Abele, Harald Wagner, Philipp Georg 2018-08-30T15:20:02Z 2018-08-30T15:20:02Z 2016
dc.identifier.issn 1438-8804
dc.language.iso en de_DE
dc.publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG de_DE
dc.relation.uri de_DE
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject.ddc 610 de_DE
dc.title Comparison of Errors of 35 Weight Estimation Formulae in a Standard Collective de_DE
dc.type Article de_DE 20180405102126_00491
utue.publikation.seiten 1172-1179 de_DE
utue.personen.roh Hoopmann, M.
utue.personen.roh Kagan, K. O.
utue.personen.roh Sauter, A.
utue.personen.roh Abele, H.
utue.personen.roh Wagner, P.
dcterms.isPartOf.ZSTitelID Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde de_DE
dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Issue The estimation of foetal weight is an integral part of prenatal care and obstetric routine. In spite of its known susceptibility to errors in cases of underweight or overweight babies, important obstetric decisions depend on it. In the present contribution we have examined the accuracy and error distribution of 35 weight estimation formulae within the normal weight range of 25004000 g. The aim of the study was to identify the weight estimation formulae with the best possible correspondence to the requirements of clinical routine. de_DE
dcterms.isPartOf.ZS-Volume 76 de_DE
utue.fakultaet 04 Medizinische Fakultät de_DE

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record