The Effectiveness of Incarceration-Based Drug Treatment on Criminal Behavior: A Systematic Review

DSpace Repositorium (Manakin basiert)


Dateien:

Zitierfähiger Link (URI): http://hdl.handle.net/10900/64685
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-646850
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-6107
Dokumentart: Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2012-11
Originalveröffentlichung: Systematic Reviews, 18, 2012
Sprache: Englisch
Fakultät: Kriminologisches Repository
Kriminologisches Repository
Fachbereich: Kriminologie
DDC-Klassifikation: 360 - Soziale Probleme, Sozialdienste, Versicherungen
Schlagworte: Haft , Drogenabhängigkeit , Drogentherapie
Freie Schlagwörter:
Incarceration
Drug-Treatment
Review
Zur Langanzeige

Abstract:

Many, if not most, incarcerated offenders have substance abuse problems. Without effective treatment, these substance-abusing offenders are likely to persist in non-drug offending. The period of incarceration offers an opportunity to intervene in the cycle of drug abuse and crime. Although many types of incarceration-based drug treatment programs are available (e.g., therapeutic communities and group counseling), the effectiveness of these programs is unclear. The objective of this research synthesis is to systematically review quasi-experimental and experimental (RCT) evaluations of the effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment programs in reducing post-release recidivism and drug relapse. A secondary objective of this synthesis is to examine variation in effectiveness by programmatic, sample, and methodological features. In this update of the original 2006 review (see Mitchell, Wilson, and MacKenzie, 2006), studies made available since the original review were included in an effort to keep current with emerging research. This synthesis of evaluations of incarceration-based drug treatment programs found that such programs are modestly effective in reducing recidivism. These findings most strongly support the effectiveness of therapeutic communities, as these programs produced relatively consistent reductions in recidivism and drug use. Both counseling and incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs had mixed effects. Counseling programs were associated with reductions in recidivism but not drug use; whereas, incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs were associated with reductions in drug use but not recidivism. Note that our findings regarding the effectiveness of incarceration-based narcotic maintenance programs differ from a larger review of community-based narcotic maintenance programs (see Egli, Pina, Christensen, Aebi, and Killias, 2009). Finally, boot camp programs for drug offenders had negligible effects on both recidivism and drug use.

Das Dokument erscheint in: