dc.contributor |
The Campbell Collaboration |
|
dc.contributor.author |
David, Robert C. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Weisburd, David |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Taylor, Bruce |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-09-04T12:25:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-09-04T12:25:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-10 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
480169918 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10900/64667 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-dspace-646675 |
de_DE |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-6089 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Background:
Second responder programs are based on the premises that family violence often
recurs and that victims are likely to be especially receptive to crime prevention
opportunities immediately following victimization. A team usually consisting of
a police officer and a victim advocate follow-up on the initial police response to a
family violence complaint, provides the victim with information on services and
legal options and may warn those perpetrators present at the follow-up of the legal
consequences of continued abuse. The purpose of the intervention is to reduce the
likelihood of a new offense by helping victims to understand the cyclical nature of
family violence, develop a safety plan, obtain a restraining order, increase their
knowledge about legal rights and options, and provide shelter placement or other
relocation assistance. A secondary aim of the intervention with victims may be to
establish greater independence for victims through counseling, job training, public
assistance, or other social service referrals. The intervention has spread widely,
with support from the U.S. Department of Justice.
Objectives:
To assess the effect of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family
violence.
Main results:
The second response intervention increased slightly the odds that a household
would report another family violence incident to the police. No effect of the
intervention was found on reports of new abuse based on victim surveys.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that the second response intervention does not affect the
likelihood of new incidents of family violence. However, the intervention slightly
increases victims’ willingness to report incidents to the police, possibly as a result
of greater confidence in the police. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
de_DE |
dc.publisher |
Universität Tübingen |
de_DE |
dc.subject.classification |
Häusliche Gewalt , Prävention |
de_DE |
dc.subject.ddc |
360 |
de_DE |
dc.subject.other |
family abuse |
en |
dc.subject.other |
second responder programs |
en |
dc.subject.other |
effects |
en |
dc.subject.other |
review |
en |
dc.title |
Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fachbereich |
Kriminologie |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
Kriminologisches Repository |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.fakultaet |
Kriminologisches Repository |
de_DE |
utue.opus.portal |
kdoku |
de_DE |
utue.publikation.source |
Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15, 2008 |
de_DE |