Batist, Zachary

Publikationsdienste
→
TOBIAS-portale
→
Dokumente von Tagungen, Kongressen, Workshops und Projekten
→
CAA 2018: Human History and Digital Future
→
Dokumentanzeige

dc.contributor.author	Batist, Zachary
dc.date.accessioned	2023-10-17T13:57:06Z
dc.date.available	2024-05-17T12:48:04Z
dc.date.issued	2024-05-17
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10900/153530
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-94869
dc.description.abstract	Korrigierte Version
dc.language.iso	en	de_DE
dc.publisher	Tübingen University Press
dc.rights	cc-by-nc-nd
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en
dc.subject.classification	Archäologie , Bronzezeit , Kykladen , Fotogrammetrie	de_DE
dc.subject.ddc	930	de_DE
dc.type	ConferencePaper	de_DE
utue.publikation.fachbereich	Archäologie	de_DE
utue.abstract.en	Archaeology is a complex and communal undertaking that brings together people with varied backgrounds, who mobilize a wide range of tools and expert knowledge to assemble the archaeological record. In recognizing objects of interest and characterizing their significance through encoded disciplinary language (i.e. through data construction and other forms of scholarly communication), we situate our tacit, local experiences within an archaeological epistemic culture, or common modes of reasoning. Communication among archaeologists is therefore considered as a process of enculturation, whereby a shared understanding of the pragmatic conditions and expectations that underlie a record’s construction facilitates its continued use by others. This paper presents the preliminary results from my doctoral research, which is an attempt to better understand this archaeological epistemic culture, and to develop information infrastructures that facilitate the interoperability of archaeological data across research contexts. By observing archaeologists as they work, which includes affixing GoPro action cameras to their foreheads in order to obtain first-person perspectives, the physical, cognitive and communicative processes that comprise common fieldwork practices are formally identified and related. These observations are integrated with interviews and analysis of recording practices in order to better understand individuals’ affective roles within their socio-technical research environments, as well as the communicative processes (i.e. documentation, representation and mediation) that enable research to be distributed among archaeologists and across various settings. In sum, I trace the relationships among archaeologists, their tools, the ideas they draw from, and the archaeological record itself, as knowledge is constructed under realistic and social conditions.
dc.title.en	Documenting archaeological knowledge construction as information practices
utue.opus.portal	caa2018	de_DE
utue.publikation.source	Human History and Digital Future : Proceedings of the 46th Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology	de_DE
utue.publikation.freideutsch	Web-Visualisierung	de_DE
utue.publikation.freideutsch	digitale Archäologie	de_DE
utue.publikation.freideutsch	Laserscanning	de_DE
utue.publikation.freideutsch	Frühbronzezeit	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	Cyclades	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	Early Bronze Age	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	Web visualization	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	Laser Scanning	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	Photogrammetry	de_DE
utue.publikation.freienglisch	digital archaeology	de_DE